The Future of ILF-Afghanistan: 2007 - 2009 In the next two years, ILF-Afghanistan has three primary objectives:
(i) The continued provision of legal aid services (ii) The nationalization process The next phase of the nationalization process has two parts. First, the ILF has worked to secure funding from international donors to enable the national staff to focus on supervision and maintenance of quality representation. This funding has been secured until June 2009. In May 2007, the Canadian government agreed to fund the project for the next two years with a contribution of 2.9 Million Canadian dollars. Second, the ILF has set up an Afghan board of directors who will progressively take over the functions of the ILF board in New York. The full process is scheduled to take 24 months. In September 2006, three prominent Afghans agreed to join the board: Ms. Safia Seddiqi, a lawyer, elected member of the Afghan parliament, and also a Canadian citizen who returned to Afghanistan; Professor Ashraf Rasooli, a lawyer and advisor to the Minister of Justice and First Vice-President; and Dr Mohammad Arif, Senior Program Coordinator at Checchi, a USAID contractor. The ILF and Ibrahim Hassan, ILF-A Country Director, also have seats on the board. (iii) Becoming Afghanistan’s primary public defender office There are essentially three options for the delivery of criminal defense or legal aid services: (1) a government-run public defender’s office, where the lawyers are government employees; (2) the assignment of private counsel, where private lawyers receive a fee from the state to represent the indigent; and (3) an independent private NGO contracted by the state to provide the constitutionally mandated service, where the lawyers are salaried employees, minimizing the potential for corruption and maximizing the quality of the service. Although the provision of counsel is a constitutional right that must be provided by the state, see Afghan Const. Art. 31, this service need not be provided by state employees. The state need only ensure financially that such a service is provided. The ILF and ILF-Afghanistan believes that the best option in the short and medium term is the adoption of a system that includes independent legal aid providers under contract with the government. ILF-Afghanistan is well-placed and willing to take on the role of being an independent, private NGO under contract with the government. It could do so in a cost-effective way having already built up the infrastructure in offices throughout the country. By providing representation to 40 to 65% of indigent defendants, ILF-Afghanistan already strengthens respect for basic human rights in Afghanistan for men, women, and juveniles and ensures an increase sense of security among the poor often at risk of arbitrary incarceration. Continue with the Future Afghan Legal system
|